Skip to content
  • Attorneys
  • About Us
    • Reputation
    • History
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
  • Legal Services
    • Civil Litigation
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Appellate
      • Class Actions
      • Complex Business Litigation
      • Employment
      • Entertainment
      • Fraud, Qui Tam, Civil RICO
      • Health Care Litigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Lawyers and Law Firms
      • Municipalities and Government Entities
      • Real Estate
      • Securities Litigation
    • White Collar Defense & Government Investigations
      • Business and Financial Crimes
      • Environmental
      • Health Care Fraud and Regulatory Enforcement
      • Internal Investigations
      • Securities Fraud and Insider Trading
  • News & Insights
  • Contact

We use cookies to improve your website experience and provide additional security. By continuing to use this website, you agree to the use of cookies. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Bird Marella Bird Marella
Menu
  • Attorneys
  • About Us
    • Reputation
    • History
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
  • Legal Services
    • Civil Litigation
      • Class Actions
      • Complex Business Litigation
      • Employment
      • Entertainment
      • Fraud, Qui Tam, Civil RICO
      • Health Care Litigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Lawyers and Law Firms
      • Real Estate
      • Securities Litigation
    • White Collar Defense &
      Government Investigations
      • Business and Financial Crimes
      • Environmental
      • Health Care Fraud and Regulatory Enforcement
      • Internal Investigations
      • Securities Fraud and Insider Trading
      • Korea Practice
  • News & Insights
  • Contact
Hero background

Bird Marella Wins Summary Judgment in High-Stakes FCA Hospice Case 

December 5, 2025
Download
Copied to clipboard! twitter linkedin email
Explore
Explore
  • Reputation
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono

Home Arrow right News & Insights Arrow right Bird Marella Wins Summary Judgment in High-Stakes FCA Hospice Case 

Friday, December 5, 2025

Partners Benjamin N. Gluck and Elliot C. Harvey Schatmeier, counsel Jonathan Jackson, and associate Avi Rejwan secured summary judgment in a long-running, nine-figure False Claims Act (FCA) case on behalf of a California-based hospice provider. 

The Relators (whistleblowers) originally filed a qui tam lawsuit asserting nine sweeping causes of action under the Federal and California False Claims Acts against the client and its corporate affiliates. They alleged a broad array of schemes to defraud the government—including admitting ineligible patients, providing substandard care, and offering illegal kickbacks. The Relators sought damages in the hundreds of millions of dollars.  

After years of litigation and four amended complaints, the Court found that the Relators had failed to present evidence of any individual false claim – the sin qua non of an FCA action – and granted summary judgment in favor of Bird Marella’s client on all eight qui tam causes of action. 

Associated Attorneys

Benjamin N. Gluck

Partner

Elliot Harvey Schatmeier

Elliot C. Harvey Schatmeier

Partner

Jonathan Jackson

Jonathan M. Jackson

Of Counsel

Abraham “Avi” Rejwan

Associate

View More Associated Attorneys.
©2025 Bird, Marella, Rhow, Lincenberg, Drooks, & Nessim, LLP |  All rights reserved.
Disclaimer

|

Privacy & Cookies
Twitter Linkedin
Rendering