Skip to content
  • Attorneys
  • About Us
    • Reputation
    • History
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
  • Legal Services
    • Civil Litigation
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Appellate
      • Class Actions
      • Complex Business Litigation
      • Employment
      • Entertainment
      • Fraud, Qui Tam, Civil RICO
      • Health Care Litigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Lawyers and Law Firms
      • Municipalities and Government Entities
      • Real Estate
      • Securities Litigation
    • White Collar Defense & Government Investigations
      • Business and Financial Crimes
      • Environmental
      • Health Care Fraud and Regulatory Enforcement
      • Internal Investigations
      • Securities Fraud and Insider Trading
  • News & Insights
  • Contact

We use cookies to improve your website experience and provide additional security. By continuing to use this website, you agree to the use of cookies. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Bird Marella Bird Marella
Menu
  • Attorneys
  • About Us
    • Reputation
    • History
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
  • Legal Services
    • Civil Litigation
      • Class Actions
      • Complex Business Litigation
      • Employment
      • Entertainment
      • Fraud, Qui Tam, Civil RICO
      • Health Care Litigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Lawyers and Law Firms
      • Real Estate
      • Securities Litigation
    • White Collar Defense &
      Government Investigations
      • Business and Financial Crimes
      • Environmental
      • Health Care Fraud and Regulatory Enforcement
      • Internal Investigations
      • Securities Fraud and Insider Trading
      • Korea Practice
  • News & Insights
  • Contact
Hero background

From the Courtroom – Judge Wu indicates that he’s likely to enjoin SB 863

November 11, 2013
Download
Copied to clipboard! twitter linkedin email
Explore
Explore
  • Reputation
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono

Home Arrow right News & Insights Arrow right From the Courtroom – Judge Wu indicates that he’s likely to enjoin SB 863

Monday, November 11, 2013

On November 4, Central District of California Judge George Wu indicated that he is inclined to enjoin the workers compensation lien activation fee contained in California’s SB 863.  At that hearing, which was held in a standing-room-only courtroom, he indicated that he was inclined to reject the plaintiffs’ constitutional Taking argument but would issue the injunction based on their Equal Protection argument.  He asked the parties to return on November 7 to offer additional arguments.

On November 7, Judge Wu leaned (sorry) even farther toward the plaintiffs’ position.  He said that he will enjoin the activation fee on Equal Protection grounds and said that he will reconsider his earlier rejection of the Taking argument.  This is significant because the Taking theory may be easier to defend when Judge Wu’s ruling is appealed, as it certainly will be.

Associated Attorneys

Benjamin Gluck

Benjamin N. Gluck

Partner

View More Associated Attorneys.
©2025 Bird, Marella, Rhow, Lincenberg, Drooks, & Nessim, LLP |  All rights reserved.
Disclaimer

|

Privacy & Cookies
Twitter Linkedin
Rendering