Skip to content
  • Attorneys
  • About Us
    • Reputation
    • History
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
  • Legal Services
    • Civil Litigation
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Appellate
      • Class Actions
      • Complex Business Litigation
      • Employment
      • Entertainment
      • Fraud, Qui Tam, Civil RICO
      • Health Care Litigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Lawyers and Law Firms
      • Municipalities and Government Entities
      • Real Estate
      • Securities Litigation
    • White Collar Defense & Government Investigations
      • Business and Financial Crimes
      • Environmental
      • Health Care Fraud and Regulatory Enforcement
      • Internal Investigations
      • Securities Fraud and Insider Trading
  • News & Insights
  • Contact

We use cookies to improve your website experience and provide additional security. By continuing to use this website, you agree to the use of cookies. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Bird Marella Bird Marella
Menu
  • Attorneys
  • About Us
    • Reputation
    • History
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
  • Legal Services
    • Civil Litigation
      • Class Actions
      • Complex Business Litigation
      • Employment
      • Entertainment
      • Fraud, Qui Tam, Civil RICO
      • Health Care Litigation
      • Intellectual Property
      • Lawyers and Law Firms
      • Real Estate
      • Securities Litigation
    • White Collar Defense &
      Government Investigations
      • Business and Financial Crimes
      • Environmental
      • Health Care Fraud and Regulatory Enforcement
      • Internal Investigations
      • Securities Fraud and Insider Trading
      • Korea Practice
  • News & Insights
  • Contact
Hero background

Bird Marella Prevails in $60M Breach of Fiduciary Duty Trial After Four-Year Legal Battle

August 6, 2025
Download
Copied to clipboard! twitter linkedin email
Explore
Explore
  • Reputation
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Pro Bono

Home Arrow right News & Insights Arrow right Bird Marella Prevails in $60M Breach of Fiduciary Duty Trial After Four-Year Legal Battle

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

After four years of litigation and a three-week trial, Bird Marella lawyers Mark Drooks, Tom Reichert, and Cameron Partovi won a breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract case on behalf of three private equity firms, two of their principals, and two other individuals named as defendants.

The plaintiff, another investment firm, sued the clients in connection with the demise of a portfolio company. The company went through a foreclosure and the plaintiff and some of Bird Marella’s clients competed to purchase the assets. The plaintiff, the losing bidder, sued Bird Marella’s clients after some of the clients formed a company that succeeded in purchasing the assets out of foreclosure.

The plaintiff alleged ten causes of action, both derivatively and directly, including breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and conversion, and sought over $60 million in damages.  

Following a nearly three-hour hearing on a motion for judgment filed after the plaintiff rested its case, Judge Jeffrey S. Ross of San Francisco Superior Court granted Bird Marella’s motion in its entirety, finding that the plaintiff failed to meet its burden at trial to introduce sufficient evidence to substantiate its claims.

Associated Attorneys

Mark Drooks

Mark T. Drooks

Partner

Thomas Reichert

Thomas V. Reichert

Partner

Cameron R. Partovi

Associate

View More Associated Attorneys.
©2025 Bird, Marella, Rhow, Lincenberg, Drooks, & Nessim, LLP |  All rights reserved.
Disclaimer

|

Privacy & Cookies
Twitter Linkedin
Rendering